<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>opencast Archives - Coal Action Network</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/tag/opencast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/tag/opencast/</link>
	<description>Campaign to end the UK&#039;s coal mining, use, &#38; support</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">215576882</site>	<item>
		<title>UK Coal Round Up</title>
		<link>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/28/coal-round-up-september-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/28/coal-round-up-september-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal mines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News - Industrial coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aberperwgm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUKES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitehaven]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coalaction.org.uk/?p=13770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Update on coal extraction and use in the UK. The situation with coal production and use in the UK is changing. There is a legal challenges to the proposed West Cumbria coal mine and Aberpergwm extension; and an illegal mine operating in Merthyr Tydfil. Updated stats from the government's July Digest of UK Energy Statistics. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/28/coal-round-up-september-2023/">UK Coal Round Up</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="pl-13770"  class="panel-layout" ><div id="pg-13770-0"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-13770-0" ><div id="pgc-13770-0-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-0-0-0" class="so-panel widget panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="0" ></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-13770-1"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-13770-1" ><div id="pgc-13770-1-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-headline panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-headline so-widget-sow-headline-default-cdb323d1d00c-13770 so-widget-fittext-wrapper"
			 data-fit-text-compressor="0.85"
		><div class="sow-headline-container ">
							<h2 class="sow-headline">
						UK Coal round up 						</h2>
											<div class="decoration">
						<div class="decoration-inside"></div>
					</div>
					</div>
</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-13770-2"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-13770-2" ><div id="pgc-13770-2-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-2-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-113ccd71f3e6-13770"
			
		>
<div class="sow-image-container">
			<a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/coal-facts-and-figures/"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
			<img 
	src="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Latest-facts-and-figures-png.avif" width="1013" height="538" srcset="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Latest-facts-and-figures-png.avif 1013w, https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Latest-facts-and-figures-300x159.avif 300w, https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Latest-facts-and-figures-768x408.avif 768w" title="Latest-facts-and-figures" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
			</a></div>

</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-13770-3"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-13770-3" ><div id="pgc-13770-3-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-3-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child" data-index="3" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-3-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div dir="ltr">
<div id="panel-8302-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child" data-index="1" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-0">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<div dir="ltr">
<p>The recent <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/solid-fuels-and-derived-gases-chapter-2-digest-of-united-kingdom-energy-statistics-dukes" target="_top" rel="noopener">Digest of UK Energy Statistics</a> shows the coal situation for 2022. All unreferenced statistics come from this report and appendices.</p>
<p>Coal was bought by power stations last year in order to fulfil unexpected, short term contracts with the government worth £420 million to extend power station's lives while air quality environmental regulations were not enforced.</p>
<p>In 2022, coal mined in the UK mainly came from opencast coal mines. Production was down on previous years<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><!-- All previous years? --></span>. Now, in September 2023, there is only one operating opencast coal mine, the illegal Ffos-y-fran mine. There is one significant sized deep coal mine; Aberpergwm colliery in Neath Port Talbot, which has been granted permission to expand. From this date there is only one coal power station <span style="font-size: xx-small;"><!-- I think it would be good to name it up here though I know you have further down. --></span>available to generate electricity, down from 4 last year.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-3-0-1" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="4" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-3-0-1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Coal use in power stations</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div dir="ltr">
<div id="panel-8302-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child" data-index="1" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-0">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<div dir="ltr">
<p><a name="panel-8302-1-0-0"></a><a name="page293R_mcid8"></a>While overall energy demand in 2022 was stable compared to 2021, demand met by coal in the energy mix fell by 15% compared to 2021, <a href="http://www.mygridgb.co.uk/historicaldata/" target="_top" rel="noopener">to 1.60%</a> of total electricity supply. Wind, solar and hydro energy production rose to a record high level due to increased capacity and more favourable weather conditions, but unfortunately consumption of both gas and nuclear energy were also up.</p>
<p>Coal use in power stations has dropped dramatically since 2012, when 43% of electricity in the UK grid was produced from coal combustion. However, 4 coal power plants remained operational throughout 2022. Drax and West Burton power station's coal units were due to be closed before the end of 2022, but the UK <a href="https://www.energylivenews.com/2022/08/19/uk-could-pay-420m-for-keeping-coal-fired-power-stations-open-this-winter/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Government </a><a href="https://www.energylivenews.com/2022/08/19/uk-could-pay-420m-for-keeping-coal-fired-power-stations-open-this-winter/" target="_top" rel="noopener">paid £420 million</a> to extend the operational lifespan of the coal units over winter 2022 into 2023. Coal stocks were 10% higher than in 2021 to facilitate this. Drax didn't operate in 2022 <span style="font-size: xx-small;"><!-- Says above all 4 coal power plants remained operational...so I think the distinction needs to be made clearer. --></span>and is <a href="https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/23478927.drax-bosses-hail-end-coal-milestone-carbon-negative-future/" target="_top" rel="noopener">now decommissioning its coal units</a>. It remains a high carbon power station, though, as it <a href="https://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/axedrax-campaign/" target="_top" rel="noopener">burns imported wood</a> as biomass.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-3-0-2" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="5" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-3-0-2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Power station closures</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div id="panel-8302-1-0-1" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="2" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-1">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<p><strong>4 coal power stations operated in 2022. </strong>Now only Ratcliffe-on-Soar remains available to the grid.</p>
<p><strong>Ratcliffe on Soar power station</strong> is due to close in <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cede2e0ekw9o" target="_top" rel="noopener">September 2024</a>.</p>
<p>In early 2020, <strong>Drax power station</strong> said there would be "<a href="https://www.drax.com/investors/end-of-coal-generation-at-drax-power-station/" target="_top" rel="noopener">formal closure of the coal units in September 2022</a>". Decommissioning actually started in 2023, after the UK Government paid the power station to be on standby with coal dur<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><!-- This is an exact copy of some of the substantive para above… is there a reason for that? --></span>ing last winter. Drax did<img data-attachment-id="13940" data-permalink="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/28/coal-round-up-september-2023/dscf2130/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?fit=2560%2C1920&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="2560,1920" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;4.5&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;FinePix SL1000&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;1564982913&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;10.3&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;100&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0.004&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;1&quot;}" data-image-title="DSCF2130" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?fit=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-13940 alignright" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130.jpg?resize=300%2C225&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="300" height="225" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?resize=768%2C576&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?resize=1536%2C1152&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/DSCF2130-scaled.jpg?resize=2048%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />n't operate in 2022 and is <a href="https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/23478927.drax-bosses-hail-end-coal-milestone-carbon-negative-future/" target="_top" rel="noopener">now decommissioning its coal units</a>. It remains a high carbon power station as, though, it <a href="https://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/axedrax-campaign/" target="_top" rel="noopener">burns imported wood</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Kilroot</strong> coal and oil power station in Northern Ireland is to be converted to gas. It was expected to stop consuming coal in September 2023, but this <a href="https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/sam-mcbride/a-blackout-crisis-may-be-beyond-point-of-no-return-with-little-evidence-of-panic/a180192510.html" target="_top" rel="noopener">may have been brought forward marginally</a> (unconfirmed).</p>
<p><strong>West Burton</strong> <a href="https://www.edfenergy.com/media-centre/news-releases/end-generation-west-burton" target="_top" rel="noopener">coal power station closed</a> at the end of March 2023 delayed by the UK Government from September 2022.</p>
<p><strong>Coal phase-out</strong> in the UK is expected by October 2024. Given that coal consumption in power stations is very low, with periods of no consumption, in the summer, the last generation could be April 2024.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-3-0-3" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="6" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-3-0-3" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Underground mining</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div id="panel-8302-1-0-2" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="3" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-2">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<p>In 2022, coal production fell by 39% to a record low of 0.6 million tonnes, with opencast coal mining producing more than underground mines.[1]</p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2022/10/15/scotland-bans-coal-mining/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Scottish Government announced a </a><a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2022/10/15/scotland-bans-coal-mining/" target="_top" rel="noopener">de-facto ban on </a><a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2022/10/15/scotland-bans-coal-mining/" target="_top" rel="noopener">coal mining in October 2022</a>, in protest against the expected approval of the Whitehaven coking coal mine. We anticipate this stopped a deep coal mine application by Australian company New Age Explorations at Lochinvar in the Scottish borders. The company hoped to produce coking coal via underground mining until 2044.</p>
<p><strong>Campaigns against proposed underground mines</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/aberpergwm-coal-mine-expansion/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Aberpergwm Colliery </a></strong>(Energybuild Ltd) in Neath Port Talbot had planning permission for a <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2022/02/03/licenced-aberpergwm-extension/" target="_top" rel="noopener">42</a><a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2022/02/03/licenced-aberpergwm-extension/" target="_top" rel="noopener"> million tonne extension to its underground (anthracite) coal mine</a> approved in 2018. The Coal Authority issued the coal company a license to extract this coal in January 2022. <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/08/17/aberpergwm-appeal-acceptance/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Coal Action Network are taking legal action against the Welsh Government for failing to stop the mine extension being licenced.</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/west-cumbria-mine/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Woodhouse Colliery</a></strong> proposed by <strong>West Cumbria Mining Ltd</strong> had its proposal for a new 1.78 million tonne per year underground coking coal mine off Whitehaven approved by the Secretary of State in December 2022. The planning approval is subject to 2 legal challenges which are expected to be <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/08/10/delayed-challenges-whitehaven/" target="_top" rel="noopener">heard by the High Court in early 2024</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-3-0-4" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="7" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-3-0-4" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Opencast coal extraction</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<p>There are now no legally operating opencast coal mines in the UK.</p>
<p>Glan Lash opencast coal mine, Carmarthenshire (South Wales), had an <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/14/refused-glan-lash-opencast-coal-mine/" target="_top" rel="noopener">extension application rejected in September 2023</a>.</p>
<p>In September 2022, <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/05/25/ffos-y-fran-the-uks-biggest-illegal-coal-mine/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Ffos-y-fran opencast coal mine in Merthyr Tydfil, was due to close after 15 years of operation</a>. However, the mine has continued to operate with little action from the local council or Welsh Government. It is now expected to close at the end of Nove<img loading="lazy" data-attachment-id="13186" data-permalink="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/06/22/ffos-y-fran-unilaterally-and-unlawfully/fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?fit=1038%2C563&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="1038,563" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;danie&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;1687432743&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="Fyf dumper tuck 23-06-15" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?fit=1024%2C555&amp;ssl=1" data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-13186 alignleft" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?resize=300%2C163&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="300" height="163" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?resize=300%2C163&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?resize=1024%2C555&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?resize=768%2C417&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Fyf-dumper-tuck-23-06-15.jpg?w=1038&amp;ssl=1 1038w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />mber 2023, with no meaningful restoration of the land expected, as the company did not set aside the money to fulfil its contractual obligations in this regard. The guarantee bond of £15 million to be used in case this happens is far short of the estimated £120 million needed for restoration as per the original plan. The coal mining was originally approved by Welsh Government in 2005 as a way to restore a brownfield site at no cost to the public purse, an outcome that now appears remote.</p>
<p>Hartington opencast coal mine, Derbyshire closed at the end of Spring 2023.[2]</p>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-3-0-5" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-last-child" data-index="8" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-3-0-5" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Imports</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<p>Coal imports rose 38% in comparison with 2021 to 6.4 million tonnes in 2022 as power stations rebuilt stocks after the UK Government payments over winter. The import quantity had been decreasing prior to this government intervention.</p>
<p>In 2022, the USA was the largest exporter of coal to the UK, supplying 39%. This was followed by the Russia with 16%. Russia’s proportion of total coal imports had fallen from being the largest supplier at 43% in 2021.<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><!-- A bit of a mix of 'exports' and 'imports' being used here, suggest keeping it to one --></span></p>
<p>Coal from the <strong>USA</strong> was fairly evenly split between coking coal for steelworks and thermal coal for power stations.</p>
<p>Coal from <strong>Russia</strong> was largely for power stations.</p>
<p><strong>Australia</strong> provided 12% of imported coal. 57% of which was for power stations, the rest for steelworks. 10% of coal came from South Africa, which was entirely for power stations. Colombia supplied 7% of imported coal all to power stations.</p>
<p>The <strong>European Union</strong> supplied 9% of all coal to the UK. This coal is unlikely to have been mined in the EU<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><!-- Why do you think this? Is there a ref. to back that up? --></span>, it has most likely lost its identity as coal enters and leaves the main coal ports in Europe. Other countries made up the remainder of the imported coal.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notice-to-importers-2953-russia-import-sanctions/nti-2953-russia-import-sanctions" target="_top" rel="noopener">The UK banned Russian coal imports in August 2022.</a></p>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-13770-4"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-13770-4" ><div id="pgc-13770-4-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-4-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child" data-index="9" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-4-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-334eeca80698-13770"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">		<a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
		Steam coal imports</a></h2>
<div class="sow-image-container">
			<a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?ssl=1"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
			<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?fit=768%2C390&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="390" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?w=1968&amp;ssl=1 1968w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?resize=300%2C152&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?resize=1024%2C520&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?resize=768%2C390&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Steam-coal-in-2022.png?resize=1536%2C780&amp;ssl=1 1536w" title="Steam coal imports" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
			</a></div>

</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-4-0-1" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-last-child" data-index="10" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-4-0-1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-334eeca80698-13770"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">		<a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
		Anthracite coal imports</a></h2>
<div class="sow-image-container">
			<a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?ssl=1"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
			<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?fit=768%2C391&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="391" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?w=1966&amp;ssl=1 1966w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?resize=300%2C153&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?resize=1024%2C522&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?resize=768%2C391&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anthracite-coal-2022.png?resize=1536%2C783&amp;ssl=1 1536w" title="Anthracite coal imports" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
			</a></div>

</div></div></div></div><div id="pgc-13770-4-1"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-4-1-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child" data-index="11" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-4-1-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-334eeca80698-13770"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">		<a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
		Coking coal imports</a></h2>
<div class="sow-image-container">
			<a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?ssl=1"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
			<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?fit=768%2C397&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="397" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?w=1962&amp;ssl=1 1962w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?resize=300%2C155&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?resize=1024%2C530&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?resize=768%2C397&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Coking-coal-2022.png?resize=1536%2C795&amp;ssl=1 1536w" title="Coking coal imports" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
			</a></div>

</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-4-1-1" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-last-child" data-index="12" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-4-1-1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-334eeca80698-13770"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">		<a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
		Total coal imports</a></h2>
<div class="sow-image-container">
			<a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?ssl=1"
			target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" 		>
			<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?fit=768%2C389&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="389" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?w=1976&amp;ssl=1 1976w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?resize=300%2C152&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?resize=1024%2C518&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?resize=768%2C389&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Total-coal-imports-in-2022.png?resize=1536%2C777&amp;ssl=1 1536w" title="Total coal imports" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
			</a></div>

</div></div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-13770-5"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-13770-5" ><div id="pgc-13770-5-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-13770-5-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child" data-index="13" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-5-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">UK steel producers</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div id="panel-8302-1-0-3" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="4" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-3">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="panel-8302-1-0-4" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="5" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-4">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<p>There are 4 major UK steel producers, 2 of which are using coking coal and produce much higher emissions than the two which recycle scrap steel.</p>
<p><strong>Tata Steel</strong><br />
Port Talbot steel works, in Neath Port Talbot, Wales, is the second biggest UK single site emitter of carbon dioxide.[3] The plant currently uses coking coal to make steel in blast furnaces. In 2022, Tata Steel said the plant had to decarbonise or close. In September 2023, Tata Steel accepted £500 million from the UK <a href="https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2023-09-15/tata-steel-some-staff-have-only-been-here-eight-months-now-theyre-panicking" target="_top" rel="noopener">Government to transition to</a><a href="https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2023-09-15/tata-steel-some-staff-have-only-been-here-eight-months-now-theyre-panicking" target="_top" rel="noopener"> electric arc furnace, but job losses are expected</a>.</p>
<p><strong>British Steel</strong><br />
Currently, British Steel’s Scunthorpe plant can use a maximum of <a href="https://britishsteel.co.uk/who-we-are/sustainability/" target="_top" rel="noopener">25% to 30% recycled content using Basic Oxygen steelmaking</a>. It currently uses coking coal but is also looking to secure governmental subsidies to build a new electric arc furnace to replace a blast furnace in efforts to decarbonise.<br />
<strong><br />
Liberty</strong><br />
Liberty Steel, which has sites in Newport and in Tredegar, has said it aims to <a href="https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/steel-carbon-emissions-port-talbot-19927484" target="_top" rel="noopener">become a carbon-neutral steel producer by 2030</a>. The site currently uses Electric Arc Furnaces and recycles scrap metal so does not use coking coal.<br />
<strong><br />
Celsa</strong><br />
Celsa’s Cardiff steelworks uses <a href="http://www.celsauk.com/" target="_top" rel="noopener">100% recycled scrap steel in its products</a> and so does not need coking coal.</p>
<p>For more details see our report <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Coal-in-steel-reportproblems-and-Solutions.pdf" target="_top" rel="noopener"><i>Coal in Steel</i></a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-5-0-1" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="14" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-5-0-1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Want to help in the fight against coal?</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div id="panel-8302-1-0-5" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="6" data-style="{&quot;padding&quot;:&quot;25px 0px 0px 0px&quot;,&quot;background_image_attachment&quot;:false,&quot;background_display&quot;:&quot;tile&quot;,&quot;margin&quot;:&quot;0% 0% 0% 0%&quot;,&quot;font_color&quot;:&quot;#848484&quot;}" data-label="Post text">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-8302-1-0-5">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<ul>
<li>Follow the Coal Action Network on social media. <a href="https://twitter.com/CoalActionUK" target="_top" rel="noopener">Twitter</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/coalactionUK/" target="_top" rel="noopener">facebook</a> for updates.</li>
<li>Join <a href="https://actionnetwork.org/forms/sign-up-here-4?clear_id=true" target="_top" rel="noopener">the Coal Action Network email list and find out all the ways you can get involved!</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-5-0-2" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor" data-index="15" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-5-0-2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">References</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<p>[1] compiled from Coal Authority, "Production and Manpower Statistics" for 2022</p>
<p>[2] Gov.uk "Coal mining production and manpower returns received by the Coal Authority April to June 2023." (July 2023)</p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://ember-climate.org/project/coal-free-kingdom/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Ember, Coal Free Kingdom (13th November 2019)</a> and <a href="https://www.drax.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Drax_AR2019_Web.pdf" target="_top" rel="noopener">Drax Group, Enabling a zero carbon, lower cost energy future page 39 (2019)</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Queries and media contact: info @ coalaction . org .uk (without spaces)</strong></p>
<p class="western">
</div>
</div></div></div><div id="panel-13770-5-0-3" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-last-child" data-index="16" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-13770-5-0-3" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Media queries</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<p>References</p>
<p>[1] compiled from Coal Authority, "Production and Manpower Statistics" for 2022</p>
<p>[2] Gov.uk "Coal mining production and manpower returns received by the Coal Authority April to June 2023." (July 2023)</p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://ember-climate.org/project/coal-free-kingdom/" target="_top" rel="noopener">Ember, Coal Free Kingdom (13th November 2019)</a> and <a href="https://www.drax.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Drax_AR2019_Web.pdf" target="_top" rel="noopener">Drax Group, Enabling a zero carbon, lower cost energy future page 39 (2019)</a></p>
<p><strong>Queries and media contact: info @ coalaction . org .uk (without spaces)</strong></p>
<p class="western">
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/28/coal-round-up-september-2023/">UK Coal Round Up</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2023/09/28/coal-round-up-september-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13770</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Message from Jos from Defend Dewley Hill</title>
		<link>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/27/jos-ddh/</link>
					<comments>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/27/jos-ddh/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defend Dewley Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newcastle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencast]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coalaction.org.uk/?p=5652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My name is Jos and I’m part of the team at Defend Dewley Hill. We're a group of residents from Throckley near Newcastle, who set out to save our local landscape from opencast coal extraction, and we really need your support.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/27/jos-ddh/">Message from Jos from Defend Dewley Hill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="pl-5652"  class="panel-layout" ><div id="pg-5652-0"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5652-0" ><div id="pgc-5652-0-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5652-0-0-0" class="so-panel widget panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="0" ></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5652-1"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5652-1" ><div id="pgc-5652-1-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5652-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-headline panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-headline so-widget-sow-headline-default-cdb323d1d00c-5652 so-widget-fittext-wrapper"
			 data-fit-text-compressor="0.85"
		><div class="sow-headline-container ">
							<h2 class="sow-headline">
						Message from Jos from Defend Dewley Hill						</h2>
											<div class="decoration">
						<div class="decoration-inside"></div>
					</div>
					</div>
</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5652-2"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5652-2" ><div id="pgc-5652-2-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5652-2-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-334eeca80698-5652"
			
		>
<div class="sow-image-container">
		<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?fit=768%2C574&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="574" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?w=2477&amp;ssl=1 2477w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?resize=300%2C224&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?resize=1024%2C765&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?resize=768%2C574&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?resize=1536%2C1147&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/1.jpg?resize=2048%2C1530&amp;ssl=1 2048w" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
	</div>

</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5652-3"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5652-3" ><div id="pgc-5652-3-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5652-3-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="3" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-5652-3-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div dir="ltr">
<p>My name is Jos and I’m part of the team at <a href="https://actionnetwork.org/emails/a-message-from-jos-at-defend-dewley-hill/defenddewleyhill.org.uk?link_id=0&amp;can_id=cf19233e6418067bd9102c137969e51f&amp;source=email-a-message-from-jos-at-defend-dewley-hill&amp;email_referrer=&amp;email_subject=a-message-from-jos-at-defend-dewley-hill">Defend Dewley Hill</a>. We're a group of residents from Throckley near Newcastle, who set out to save our local landscape from opencast coal extraction, and we really need your support.</p>
<p>Banks Mining have applied to extract 800,000 tonnes of coal and 400,000 tonnes of fireclay from Dewley Hill on the fringe of our village in Throckley.</p>
<p>We know that coal is the most catastrophic fossil fuel for our climate and that industries such as steel are rapidly developing new technology to eradicate coal use.</p>
<p>Despite Newcastle City Council declaring a climate emergency, we’re facing the prospect of the last opencast mine in England threatening our village.</p>
<p>None of us set out on the journey to become activists, but this bunch of taxi drivers, occupational therapists, managers, shop assistants, care workers, teachers, young and older people alike, have joined forces to defend the land we live on and have inadvertently become a campaign group together striving to see an end to fossil fuels.</p>
<p>We are raising funds for legal advice to help our group to have the best chance possible of defeating the coal mine this year. Newcastle City Council will make a decision in the month and we need to be ready to challenge the council's expected recommendation to approve it, or to fight the mining company's appeal.</p>
<p>We’ve worked hard to highlight our plight and speak out about our concerns. We’ve held demonstrations and walks on the land. We’ve made films and interviewed people about their past experiences. There are banners round the boundary and we have encouraged thousands of people to object</p>
<p>We're a community full of love for our land and brimming with energy and ideas, but we're not a wealthy community, so the costly legal advice could be a barrier to us in fighting this last leg we so need to win.</p>
<p><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/can2-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/data/000/478/407/original/Jos_and_co.jpeg?w=753&#038;ssl=1"  /></p>
<p>The only way we can win this is through reaching out to people who care...which is why we need you.</p>
<p>See <a href="https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/defend-dewley-hill/?link_id=1&amp;can_id=cf19233e6418067bd9102c137969e51f&amp;source=email-a-message-from-jos-at-defend-dewley-hill&amp;email_referrer=&amp;email_subject=a-message-from-jos-at-defend-dewley-hill">the crowdfunder page</a> for more information on the legal actions we are preparing to take to stop the opencast coal site. (<a href="https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/defend-dewley-hill/">https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/defend-dewley-hill/</a>)</p>
<p>Coal is a proud part of our history in the North East, but it is not our future. This is the only remaining application for opencast coal mining in the UK, and if we can defeat it, then there's every chance it will be the last.</p>
<p>Please support us and contribute whatever you can to our crowdfunder to help us make a significant last stand against opencast coal mining.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Jos<br />
Defend Dewley Hill</p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/27/jos-ddh/">Message from Jos from Defend Dewley Hill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/27/jos-ddh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5652</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update- Defend Dewley Hill</title>
		<link>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/04/update-defend-dewley-hill/</link>
					<comments>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/04/update-defend-dewley-hill/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Councillors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dewley Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newcastle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencast]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coalaction.org.uk/?p=5560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Newcastle City Council are expected to decide whether to protect the area at Dewley Hill to the West of the city, or if Banks Group is allowed to opencast it instead before the end of the year. The hearing will either be the 20th November or the 18th December.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/04/update-defend-dewley-hill/">Update- Defend Dewley Hill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="pl-5560"  class="panel-layout" ><div id="pg-5560-0"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5560-0" ><div id="pgc-5560-0-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5560-0-0-0" class="so-panel widget panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="0" ></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5560-1"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5560-1" ><div id="pgc-5560-1-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5560-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-headline panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-headline so-widget-sow-headline-default-cdb323d1d00c-5560 so-widget-fittext-wrapper"
			 data-fit-text-compressor="0.85"
		><div class="sow-headline-container ">
							<h2 class="sow-headline">
						Update- Defend Dewley Hill						</h2>
											<div class="decoration">
						<div class="decoration-inside"></div>
					</div>
					</div>
</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5560-2"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5560-2" ><div id="pgc-5560-2-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5560-2-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-334eeca80698-5560"
			
		>
<div class="sow-image-container">
		<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DDH-winter.jpg?fit=768%2C576&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="576" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DDH-winter.jpg?w=960&amp;ssl=1 960w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DDH-winter.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DDH-winter.jpg?resize=768%2C576&amp;ssl=1 768w" title="DDH winter" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
	</div>

</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5560-3"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div id="image_gallery_custom" class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5560-3" ><div id="pgc-5560-3-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5560-3-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="3" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-5560-3-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Newcastle residents take action against coal</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<p>Newcastle City Council are expected to decide whether to protect the area at Dewley Hill to the West of the city, or if Banks Group is allowed to opencast it instead before the end of the year. The hearing will either be the 20th November or the 18th December.</p>
<p>If you live in Newcastle please <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc3bdnEa5w08GCVGSRVwzHzgvFDzeF3Tf6c2mJ62t1GByJ6Ww/viewform?gxids=7757">sign this open letter to Councillors</a> against the application to extract 800,000 tonnes of thermal coal and 400,000 tonnes of fireclay. It is only for local people based in Newcastle. (The site lies next to the county boundary with Northumberland, but Northumberland County Council are allowing Newcastle to decide the fate of the area.)</p>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5560-4"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div id="image_gallery_custom" class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5560-4" ><div id="pgc-5560-4-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5560-4-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_media_video panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="4" ><div style="width:100%;" class="wp-video"><video class="wp-video-shortcode" id="video-5560-1" preload="metadata" controls="controls"><source type="video/vimeo" src="https://vimeo.com/456117294?loop=0&#038;_=1" /><a href="https://vimeo.com/456117294?loop=0">https://vimeo.com/456117294?loop=0</a></video></div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5560-5"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5560-5" ><div id="pgc-5560-5-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5560-5-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="5" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-5560-5-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div dir="ltr">
<div id="panel-4962-5-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child" data-index="5">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-4962-5-0-0">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<h2 class="widget-title">Local reasons against Dewley Hill opencast</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<div dir="ltr">
<ul>
<li>The proposal sits on over <strong>250 acres</strong> of Newcastle’s green belt land, which should be protected from development.</li>
<li>Opencast coal mining destroys everything that lies over the coal seem. This means the waterways, mature trees, hedgerows, wildlife, top soil, public rights of way are all stripped away.</li>
<li>Opencast coal mines are incredibly disruptive to local people. If this opencast went ahead it would increase traffic on the roads, including heavy goods vehicles on the A69. The sites are brightly lit, which is particularly irritating in rural areas in winter to humans and to bats all year round. The machines are noisy, often in an irregular, irritating way. Opencast mining throws up dust, which includes all of the toxins located in the coal.</li>
<li>Northumberland Wildlife Trust remains concerned about the impact on farmland birds such as skylark, lapwing and yellowhammer during the active stage of the proposed mine. Hedgerow removal would interrupt animals’ movement through the area.</li>
<li>The site lies in the catchment area of the Dewley and Ouse burns. Coal mine dust is toxic as it contains mercury, silica, cadmium, arsenic and the air pollutants which killed underground miners.</li>
<li>This application would involve work on the site for 3.5 years. Banks Group may well submit further plans for extensions. Previous applications included coal removal from the east and the west of this proposal, so there is clearly more coal adjacent.</li>
<li>The fireclay that could be extracted is not needed and should not be considered as a benefit. Ibstock Brick are a partner in this application. However the council has “confirmed that there is a sufficient landbank of 27 years’ permitted reserves for brick clay from Red Barns Quarry in South Tyneside” according to the Development and Allocation Plan report.</li>
<li>How Banks Group intend on putting back the site can only be a degradation on what currently exists or could be created on the site without coal extraction. So called ‘restoration’ cannot put back what was there and the soil structures that biodiversity rely on would be diminished. None of the proposed benefits of restoration need rely on the area being opencast first. Bank Group’s Pegswood leaky lake is still an eye sore well over a decade since coal extraction finished. The companies high claims for ‘restoration’ should be ignored.</li>
<li>The Northumberland Wildlife Trust severed ties with Banks Group in May 2019. The Trust’s chief executive, <a href="https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/northumberland-wildlife-trust-severs-ties-16201604">told the Chronicle</a>: “The reason we are [severing ties] is we are now looking to underline the fact that we do not approve of [Banks Group’s] constant applications and proposals for opencast coal extraction…We are totally against coal extraction as a trust”.</li>
<li>The proposal is smaller than previous ones on the same site, but the impacts would still be significant for local people and the environment.</li>
<li>The proposal threatens jobs in the area and reduces the farm land available for food production. If approved the opencast would be very visible and give a poor impression to tourists in our area who may be less inclined to return.</li>
<li>Banks Group won’t be providing new jobs as experienced staff will be moved from nearby opencast operations which have closed. There is no future in coal mining.</li>
<li>Residents at Bank’s Bradley site in the Pont Valley Durham reported issues with light pollution, noise, water run offs, inappropriate use of blasting flags, and aggressive security guards. The same issues are likely here if the application were to be approved.</li>
<li>Air pollution from the A69 is already a problem, an opencast coal mine in the area would worsen this issue.</li>
<li>The company proposed an additional 302 vehicle movements a day to the site entering via Ponteland road, the B6323, everyday. Banks propose a simple T-junction which could cause congestion and be intimidating for vulnerable road users such as cyclists.</li>
<li>The £50,000 offered in total to community groups is a bribe to accept something which is not acceptable. Clean air and wide open spaces are worth more than this.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="panel-4962-5-0-1" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-last-child" data-index="6">
<div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-4962-5-0-1">
<div class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base">
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
<h2><b>National and international reasons this must be rejected</b></h2>
<ul>
<li>The coal at the site is thermal coal, it is mainly used in power stations, but can be used in some industrial processes. <a href="https://policy.friendsoftheearth.uk/insight/uk-coal-why-government-mustnt-dig-us-hole">Coal power stations are to be phased-out by 2024 and we have large stockpiles of this type of coal.</a></li>
<li>Coal, wherever it is consumed causes climate change. Power stations have to close by 2024 because of the emissions from burning coal. The single largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the UK is Tata Steel’s Port Talbot Steel works, the second is British Steel’s Scunthorpe steel works. If Banks sold the coal to industry, it would still be contributing to climate change which affects those who least caused it the most.</li>
<li>We have alternatives to this coal already in use. We can power electricity generation without coal, there are alternatives ways to make steel including by recycling, that use other fuels. Cement can be made without coal, <a href="https://www.intechopen.com/books/alternative-fuel/alternative-fuels-in-cement-manufacturing">alternatives have been around long enough to be adopted</a>.</li>
<li>The coal used in steel works as a reducing agent is coking coal. This site contains thermal coal which Banks said was needed for power station in the 2016 scoping report.</li>
<li>Extracting more coal means that more coal will be consumed. If coal is extracted here, there is no comparable amount being left in the ground elsewhere. The emissions from the consumption and transport of coal from this site would worsen climate change. <a href="https://www.facebook.com/coalactionUK/videos/656964551560948/">See Professor Paul Ekins from University College London’s video regarding this</a>.</li>
<li>Transporting coal to the final consumer represents a small proportion of the emissions resulting from burning it, but Banks focusses on the emissions from transport. The sustainable solution is to stop burning coal, not to get it from a nearer source. Much more significant quantities of carbon are released from burning the coal than its transport with smaller amounts from the operation of the mine and the methane released.</li>
<li>A fixed haulage route is not being proposed as Banks Group want to be able to take the coal to a number of sites meaning the coal could be transported significant distances by lorry. If it is transported by train Banks suggests it would go to Butterwell Disposal Point, subjecting the nearby residents to more years of coal related disruption, which they had to suffer when that site was an active opencast mine.</li>
<li>Newcastle and Northumberland Councils have declared a climate emergency. As such climate change must be considered in every decision and action taken to reduce emissions. A new coal mine is the exact opposite of that.</li>
<li>National Planning Policy Framework paragraph says 211. “Planning permission should not be granted for the extraction of coal unless:<br />
a) the proposal is environmentally acceptable, or can be made so by planning conditions or obligations; or<br />
b) if it is not environmentally acceptable, then it provides national, local or community benefits which clearly outweigh its likely impacts (taking all relevant matters into account, including any residual environmental impacts).</li>
<li>Clearly this application does not meet this test and so should be rejected.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/04/update-defend-dewley-hill/">Update- Defend Dewley Hill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/11/04/update-defend-dewley-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5560</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opencast coal mine at Druridge Bay rejected</title>
		<link>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/09/09/druridge-rejected/</link>
					<comments>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/09/09/druridge-rejected/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of the Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Druridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coalaction.org.uk/?p=5358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Late on the 8th September 2020, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government said that Banks Group will not be allowed to extract coal from Highthorn, close to Druridge Bay, Northumberland. Save Druridge, the local community group, are delighted. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/09/09/druridge-rejected/">Opencast coal mine at Druridge Bay rejected</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="pl-5358"  class="panel-layout" ><div id="pg-5358-0"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5358-0" ><div id="pgc-5358-0-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5358-0-0-0" class="so-panel widget panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="0" ></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5358-1"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5358-1" ><div id="pgc-5358-1-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5358-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-headline panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-headline so-widget-sow-headline-default-cdb323d1d00c-5358 so-widget-fittext-wrapper"
			 data-fit-text-compressor="0.85"
		><div class="sow-headline-container ">
							<h2 class="sow-headline">
						DRURIDGE BAY OPENCAST COAL MINE REJECTED						</h2>
											<div class="decoration">
						<div class="decoration-inside"></div>
					</div>
					</div>
</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5358-2"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5358-2" ><div id="pgc-5358-2-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5358-2-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-113ccd71f3e6-5358"
			
		>
<div class="sow-image-container">
		<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Druridge-action-post.png?fit=768%2C514&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="514" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Druridge-action-post.png?w=1024&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Druridge-action-post.png?resize=300%2C201&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Druridge-action-post.png?resize=768%2C514&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Druridge-action-post.png?resize=272%2C182&amp;ssl=1 272w" title="Druridge action post" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
	</div>

</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5358-3"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5358-3" ><div id="pgc-5358-3-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5358-3-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="3" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-5358-3-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<div dir="ltr">
<p>Late on the 8<sup>th</sup> September 2020, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government said that Banks Group will not be allowed to extract coal from Highthorn, close to Druridge Bay, Northumberland. <a href="http://www.savedruridge.co.uk/">Save Druridge</a>, the local community group, are delighted.</p>
<p>Local resident Lynne Tate said, “<span style="font-size: medium;">Save Druridge have been fighting </span><span style="font-size: medium;">against </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Banks </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Group trying</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> to open a coal opencast at Druridge Bay for th</span><span style="font-size: medium;">e</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> last </span><span style="font-size: medium;">seven</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> y</span><span style="font-size: medium;">ea</span><span style="font-size: medium;">rs. We are extremely pleased therefore that once again a Secretary of State, namely Robert Jenrick, has</span> rejected this application. Druridge Bay is a beautiful area consisting of a seven mile beach and dunes, many wildlife reserves, a coastal footpath, agricultural fields and woods running up to meet the A1068. The thought of this area being once again torn up, for a destructive opencast site over a period of seven years was unimaginable.”</p>
<p>On behalf of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local government the official letter said, “the proposed development is not likely to provide national, local or community benefits which clearly outweigh its likely impacts (taking all relevant matters into account, including any residual environmental impacts). It therefore fails the test required by paragraph 211(b) of the [National Planning Policy] Framework. The presumption against the granting of permission for the extraction of coal therefore applies in this case.”</p>
<p>Banks Group wanted to extract 2.765 million tonnes of coal by opencast methods. The original application was submitted in October 2015 for coal for combustion at power stations. The application was rejected by Sajid Javid in October 2018. The UK government is now planning on phasing-out coal by 2024, earlier than the original date of 2025.</p>
<p>Anne Harris from the Coal Action Network says, “This is a really significant decision. The UK government has finally acted on its own words regarding emissions and stopped a new opencast coal mine. There is no justification for continuing to exploit the world's resources when climate change is increasingly being felt, particularly by those in the global south who least contributed to the atmospheric changes.”</p>
<p>She goes on to say, “It was really important for global action on climate change that the decision went this way at Highthorn. We need to stop extracting coal globally and stop burning it anywhere. The government's decision to stop the mine was the only one that serves the needs of the local, national and international populations and ecosystems.”</p>
<p>June Davison, who lives adjacent to Banks' opencast site in the Pont Valley Durham which stopped removing coal last month says, “I've watched as the Pont Valley has been ripped apart and now the government finally say they will not support the extraction and burning of coal at Druridge Bay. The joy I can take in this decision is that this opencast coal site in the Pont Valley will be the last opencast.”</p>
<p>Jos Forester-Melville who is campaigning against a further Banks Groups opencast mine application at Dewley Hill near Throckley, Newcastle-upon-Tyne said, “We’re delighted to hear the outcome of this very positive result for our friends at Druridge Bay. In essence, it’s the only decision that could be made which will preserve the beautiful landscape but more importantly, the environment and people’s health. We very much hope this is reflective of the decision which should be made about open cast proposals at Dewley Hill and indeed at all sites across the North East. Coal is very much our past and it’s great to see that the decision has been upheld that it holds no part in our future.”</p>
<p>Anne Harris went on to say, “The Secretary of State did not believe Banks Group's claim that industrial coal demand will remain at current levels. We've seen huge falls in demand for coal for power stations. Now it's time to invest in long-term jobs in environmentally appropriate renewable energy and decarbonising heavy industry, there is no future for coal. There is no crisis needing coal supply, the real crisis, in addition to the current pandemic, is the climate emergency."</p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/09/09/druridge-rejected/">Opencast coal mine at Druridge Bay rejected</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/09/09/druridge-rejected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5358</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opencast coal mine at Druridge Bay rejected</title>
		<link>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/07/10/opencast-coal-mine-at-druridge-bay-rejected/</link>
					<comments>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/07/10/opencast-coal-mine-at-druridge-bay-rejected/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of the Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Druridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coalaction.org.uk/?p=5404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Late on the 8th September 2020, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government said that Banks Group will not be allowed to extract coal from Highthorn, close to Druridge Bay, Northumberland. Save Druridge, the local community group, are delighted. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/07/10/opencast-coal-mine-at-druridge-bay-rejected/">Opencast coal mine at Druridge Bay rejected</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="pl-5404"  class="panel-layout" ><div id="pg-5404-0"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5404-0" ><div id="pgc-5404-0-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5404-0-0-0" class="so-panel widget panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="0" ></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5404-1"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5404-1" ><div id="pgc-5404-1-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5404-1-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-headline panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="1" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-headline so-widget-sow-headline-default-cdb323d1d00c-5404 so-widget-fittext-wrapper"
			 data-fit-text-compressor="0.85"
		><div class="sow-headline-container ">
							<h2 class="sow-headline">
						Coal mining in the Pont Valley to end August 2020						</h2>
											<div class="decoration">
						<div class="decoration-inside"></div>
					</div>
					</div>
</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5404-2"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5404-2" ><div id="pgc-5404-2-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5404-2-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-image panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="2" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-image so-widget-sow-image-default-113ccd71f3e6-5404"
			
		>
<div class="sow-image-container">
		<img 
	src="https://i0.wp.com/www.coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/bradley-rejection-post-e1604074297944.png?fit=768%2C514&amp;ssl=1" width="768" height="514" title="bradley rejection post" alt="" 		class="so-widget-image"/>
	</div>

</div></div></div></div></div><div id="pg-5404-3"  class="panel-grid panel-has-style" ><div class="panel-row-style panel-row-style-for-5404-3" ><div id="pgc-5404-3-0"  class="panel-grid-cell" ><div id="panel-5404-3-0-0" class="so-panel widget widget_sow-editor panel-first-child panel-last-child" data-index="3" ><div class="panel-widget-style panel-widget-style-for-5404-3-0-0" ><div
			
			class="so-widget-sow-editor so-widget-sow-editor-base"
			
		><h2 class="widget-title">Coal mining in the Pont Valley to end August 2020</h2>
<div class="siteorigin-widget-tinymce textwidget">
	<p>Campaign to Protect Pont Valley and other local people are delighted that Banks plans to further exploit the Pont Valley were dashed.</p>
<p>On the 1st July Durham County Council planning committee voted to reject Banks Group's controversial proposal for 'West Bradley' an extension to the current 'Bradley' opencast coal site between Dipton and Leadgate which would have caused another 90,000 tonnes of coal to be extracted over a further 1 year period. Had it been approved it would have added further disruption to people living in the area and worsening the local and international environment.</p>
<p>The written particulars of the decision said, "The proposed development would not be environmentally acceptable with respect to landscape and visual impacts and residential amenity impacts, and could not be made so by planning conditions or obligations contrary to saved County Durham Minerals Local Plan Policies M7a, M23, M24, M36 and M37, Paragraph 211a) of the National Planning Policy Framework and Emerging County Durham Plan Policy 54."</p>
<p>Although the planning officer for the council considered the County Durham Minerals Local Plan(2008) out of date, she chose to ignore that several of the restrictions it contained which went against this application are also expected to be included in the forth coming County Durham Plan.</p>
<p>Councillor Mark Wilkes who proposed the motion to refuse the opencast explained, said “Is it in the national interest to pump out more CO2 and other pollutants into atmosphere and stymie the development of alternative technologies? The government have committed to a Clean Steel Fund. We have to protect the local community and the nation from the adverse environmental impacts.”</p>
<p>Of the local impacts, a key contentious issue was that the site would be 33m from the nearest homes, where 250 metres had been the acceptable standard in the past, where opencast coal mining includes blasting rock with explosives and releasing dust particles into the surrounding area. Of this point Councillor Wilkes added: “This is where people live and sit in their gardens and want to breathe clean air. This is 2020 not 1820.”</p>
<p>The green area to the top of the image has been saved</p>
<p>Previous opencast coal mine applications have covered the contested area, and always been rejected. The area consisted of two fields which sustained wildlife as they had been left in a fairly natural condition, and a strip of trees at the top of a woodland in an area of High Landscape Value.</p>
<p>Speaking at the hearing, Alan Holmes of Campaign to Protect Pont Valley argued that approval was inconsistent with Durham's future plans including climate mitigation plans: “The County Durham Plan asserts climate change issues should be considered in every aspect of strategy and decision making. The Officer’s Report recommends no weight is afforded to the emergent County Plan, even though it will form the basis of decision making well into the future.”</p>
<p>Michael Litchfield of Derwent Valley Protection Society also spoke against the mine at the hearing saying “There is no national need for the open cast coal that could possibly outweigh the environmental and social cost of this opportunistic scheme.”</p>
<p>Banks Group had submitted two planning applications, the first to extend the area of coal extraction and the second to change the conditions of the current permit. Both were rejected. As such the opencast has to stop extracting coal in August 2020 and back fill the site, remove the bunds, demolish the facilities and landscape the area by August 2021.</p>
<p>Anne Harris from Coal Action Network said that “We must leave the coal in the ground, here and at the other sites Banks Group wishes to destroy. Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick should take note and decisively reject Druridge Bay, a 3 million tonne coal mine in Northumberland which is still awaiting his decision.</p>
<p>“In contrast to the dodgy developer lobbying we have seen in the news in recent weeks, the community groups and individuals who have petitioned, door-knocked, written letters, have managed to convince planners that a coal mine is not in anyone's interest. We applaud the councillors who listened to the community and took the only right course of action in a climate emergency. The impact of this decision will be felt nationally as more mines are set to go before planning committees.”</p>
<p>Banks Group's proposal for another opencast coal site, Dewley Hill near Newcastle, is awaiting a planning hearing date, and has also been countered by a strong community campaign, Defend Dewley Hill.</p>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/07/10/opencast-coal-mine-at-druridge-bay-rejected/">Opencast coal mine at Druridge Bay rejected</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.coalaction.org.uk">Coal Action Network</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.coalaction.org.uk/2020/07/10/opencast-coal-mine-at-druridge-bay-rejected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5404</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
